I started a year of self-portraits in August of 2006. I ended up doing it for 2 years straight not because I am narcissistic (though I am, a bit), but because I was learning things and enjoying it and ok fuck yes, because I'm narcissistic.
Taking daily self-portraits while trying to be creative got me thinking about how we present ourselves to the world, and how we can manipulate how others see us so easily in some ways, but in other ways it is far out of our control. With a still image especially (and this is why 'art' is subjective), the viewer creates a completely new work of art when they bring their own experience to the image. People are only seeing one small sliver of who I am when I present a self-portrait, even when I think I am giving more. Sometimes they are misunderstanding me completely (and I don't mind). Sometimes they are seeing a deeper meaning when there isn't one, or not seeing one when I felt like I displayed my very soul. In reality, the viewer is seeing part of me, yes, but they are seeing themselves more.
This year of self-portraits so far has been quite a different experience, personally. Or maybe I just forgot how introspective it can make me feel (more than usual), and how sensitive and raw it can make me feel. Narcissism aside, putting oneself out there day after day after day can make one feel more vulnerable than ever. It can be hard sometimes, but that's part of the whole experience I think. I shot this photo on Day 34 because I didn't want to be seen, really. I've played with this concept before (with this mask):

Then on Day 35 I went into the city to see a discussion about Andy Warhol put on by the Da Vinci Art Alliance (of which I'm a member) to mark the 25th anniversary of his death. His nephew and niece, both artists, were there to share family stories and art as well as a lecture from Dr. Deb Miller, President of Da Vinci.

That Warhol lecture really got under my skin. It's funny because when I was first introduced to Warhol's work as a teen (the first I remember seeing it in a museum, anyway), I hated it. I didn't get what he was about or what he was doing. Later on in years now (much), I have a real appreciation for it. Oh, and on a side note, we were shown a bunch of his early illustration work (before he got into pop art), that I'd never seen before and it was absolutely wonderful.
Anyway. Andy did a series of film (movie film) portraits from 1963-1966 called the Screen Tests. Subjects (such as Lou Reed, Allen Ginsberg, Salvador Dali) were asked to sit still in front of the camera for three minutes, creating a "living portrait." The results are fascinating as different aspects came out of each person's personality. Some individuals did not follow instructions. Deb Miller in her lecture the other night said about these that Andy told subjects not to smile--unless it was a fake smile.
This got me thinking more about how we see ourselves and present ourselves to others, and how others see us. I played around taking photos last night with this wig and without, making "fake smiles" and faces to the camera as I thought about all of this. And this is what you get.

I kind of love how weird it is and how much it doesn't look like me.